GSK – Pipeline progress
HLN – Disposal
PRX – FY results; Clearer value
SPDI – FY results; Pleasingly strong
STM – FY results; Waiting on approvals
PRX – FY results; Clearer value
Prosus released its FY 2024 results on Monday. As expected, these showed strong momentum in the business, particularly in terms of the bottom line and associated cash flow generation – a welcome consequence of the end of the era of ‘free money’ being that start/scale ups’ business models need to prove their worth. In the event, PRX’s consolidated revenues climbed from $5.0bn to $5.5bn, gross margins widened 750bps (to 40.6%), and EBIT improved to -$546m (a five year high) from -$1.0bn. Helped by income from associates and disposal gains, statutory net earnings were $6.6bn. PRX had pledged a big improvement in the performance of its E-commerce businesses and this was delivered on, with a trading profit of $38m, a $451m y/y improvement. The argument could previously be made that PRX deserved to trade at a discount to the value of its listed investments as its E-commerce businesses were loss-making. This argument no longer holds water. Cash flow was a major highlight, with operating cash flow of $1.0bn in FY 2024, up from -$120m in the prior year and ending five consecutive years of outflows (totalling $920m). Prosus spent $7bn on share buybacks last year, with the $17bn spend in the past two years helping to boost per-share NAV by 8%. The coming year should see more of the same – portfolio optimisation, accretive buybacks, and targeted improvements in the E-commerce businesses. This should make the value in this stock clearer to see, to my mind. As a footnote, this week it was reported that Deliveroo had rebuffed an M&A approach from DoorDash, which PRX has a $0.1bn stake in. To the extent that Food Delivery / Tech generally sees a pick-up in M&A, that should be helpful for PRX’s portfolio of assets. In addition to DoorDash, PRX also has stakes in other food/grocery delivery platforms including DeliveryHero, Meituan, Swiggy and iFood. Prosus’ market cap (€86bn) sits well below the value of its stake in Tencent (€102bn) alone, which makes the stock look ridiculously cheap to my mind given the profitability of its owned businesses, accretion from ongoing buybacks and the portfolio of listed assets outside of Tencent.
STM – FY results; Waiting on approvals
STM Group released its FY 2023 results on Thursday. The results themselves are (I hope) of academic interest only given the expected imminent takeover of the company at an attractive price. For what it’s worth, they show a steady performance, with adjusted revenue climbing from £24.6m in FY 2022 to £28.1m, helped by £3m of additional interest income, and underlying PBT increasing from £4.7m to £5.8m. Net cash was in-line at £13.6m from £13.9m at end-2022. Given the proposed acquisition of the Group, no dividend has been declared in respect of FY 2023 performance. On current trading, STM says that year to date “the Group has continued to trade in line with the Board’s expectations”. On the takeover, the acquisition remains subject to change of control approvals by both Gibraltar and Malta. The long-stop date was previously extended to COB today (28 June) and earlier today the Group announced a further extension to 30 August, although the upbeat tone of the closing part of the Chairman’s letter in the FY results release possibly hints at a near-term resolution: “I look forward to updating the market in due course in relation to the change of control approvals”. An exit at the maximum agreed takeover price of 60p up-front and up to a further 7p/share deferred would represent a satisfactory 2x return on my investment. That the share price is at 56p suggests the market has a high degree of confidence that the transaction will complete.
SPDI – FY results; Pleasingly strong
Secure Property Development & Investment (SPDI) released its FY 2023 results earlier today. I had expected the results to show a decent result, given the settlement of the Bluehouse litigation for €0.5m (well inside the €2.5m provision). The results reflect this €2m gain, but the FY outturn was a profit of €6.5m (FY 2022: A loss of €10m), helped by gains versus book value totalling €7.5m on non-core assets. This helped NAV jump 40% from 10c to 14c per share (from €13m to €19m). The finalisation of the Arcona transaction is guided for Q3 2024, with the last steps being the transfer of the Ukrainian land assets from SPDI to Arcona and the distribution of Arcona shares to SPDI shareholders. Once that concludes, SPDI’s remaining property assets are Romanian logistics facilities. SPDI says that, along with JV partner Myrian Nes, it is looking at developing two different properties for the same tenant in two regional Romanian cities. At a high level, SPDI’s €19m of NAV (versus today’s market cap of £5m) is represented by Arcona shares (€12m); the owned Innovations Logistics Park in Bucharest (€3.8m) and the Ukrainian land bank (€1.5m). The latter is due to be swapped for more Arcona shares and the Arcona shares are due to be divvied out to SPDI shareholders in the coming months. This will leave the rump SPDI as a pure-play Romanian logistics business thereafter. Given the variance between the NAV (14c) and the share price (4p), I am happy to be long SPDI, but I will re-evaluate my position after the distribution of the Arcona shares to see if I want to remain long the rest of the Group.
HLN – Disposal
Haleon announced on Wednesday that it has agreed to sell its NRT business outside of the US to Dr. Reddy’s for a total consideration of £500m (and customary working capital adjustments). HLN will receive an up-front payment of £458m and £42m of performance-based contingent consideration over the period to end-H1 2026. The transaction is expected to close in early Q4. The NRT business consists of brands including Nicotinell, Nicabate, Habitrol and Thrive and has a presence across over 30 countries. This disposal had been well flagged in media reports and is consistent with HLN’s ambition to sharpen its portfolio. On the use of proceeds, HLN says it “will be determined in line with capital allocation priorities, including reducing leverage”. Given the timing of the disposal, the impact on guided FY 2024 net revenue and adjusted operating operating profit is minimal (0.5-1.0%). At 16.6x consensus 2025 earnings HLN isn’t the cheapest, but it is inexpensive relative to peers (reflecting the Pfizer overhang).
GSK – Pipeline progress
Two updates on Monday from GSK highlighted the ongoing promise from its R&D pipeline. The European Medicines Agency has accepted an application for Jemperli (dostarlimab) plus chemotherapy for use to all patients with primary advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer. GSK says it is “the only immune-oncology-based therapy to show a statistically significant and clinically meaningful overall survival benefit in the broader patient population”. Approval is expected in H1 2025. There are c.417k new cases of endometrial cancer reported each year worldwide, c.121k of which are in Europe. In other news, GSK’s Omjjara (momelotinib) has received regulatory approval in Japan for treatment of myelofibrosis. This follows similar approvals from the US FDA, European Commission and the UK authorities. Myelofibrosis affects around 1 in every 500k people worldwide. These approvals help to broaden the addressable market for GSK’s product suite, which is an incremental positive for the stock. As an aside, I note this evening’s release that shows a confidential settlement has been released in another single name Zantac case in the US, although that’s minor relative to the contingent liability GSK is addressing – supported by what seems to me like compelling scientific evidence in its favour. GSK is very cheap, trading on just 8.6x consensus 2025 earnings and yielding 4.1%.